Monday, February 18, 2008

Reading Comprehension Processes

I was assigned to read the Applegate article where they identified reader profiles by observing discussion and students’ answers to inference and critical response items. I was eager to learn what profile I would fall into, but became bothered when I began reading the descriptions of each profile. I thought that each profile description painted a negative picture of the student’s method of comprehension. I actually found myself becoming defensive and not wanting to place myself in any category. Who wants to be labeled as a dodger, fuzzy thinker, or minimalists? This is not to say, however, that the article did not bring up some good points. In fact, after reading it through carefully, I did begin to make some connections to my own reading comprehension process. In early and even later elementary, I think I would have classified myself as a literalist reader, meaning I believed “all answers to all questions could ultimately be found in the text”. I gave the author complete control of my thought and rarely questioned the underlying motives for the story and the characters. Like most young children, I liked when there was a cut and dry answer, and often didn’t put much reflective thought into the characters’ actions and emotions. I believe this is why I would always struggle with the comprehension section on standardized tests. I never knew why I had such a hard time with this section since I considered myself a strong reader. Applegate’s article explained this was since standardized tests focused less and less on literal reading when it came to asking questions.
After some practice, I got used to reflective reading to gain a better understanding of the text. As I have grown older, I believe that I read in a much different manner than when I was young. I now read deeper into the text and force myself to come up with my own inferential questions as I read along. I am also big on making predictions as to what will happen next. These comprehension strategies have helped me come a long way since elementary school. Since I am an elementary education major with a focus in language arts, I have been fortunate enough to take some really fascinating English courses in college. Although not every book I have read in these courses has been life changing, my professors have gotten me in the habit of making text-to-world connections. Not only has this become another one of my comprehension strategies, but it has also forced me to think beyond the text and place myself, rather than the author, in control of my reading.

5 comments:

Catherine Cook said...

I also argeed with you on the fact that it's hard not to become somewhwat defensive about the comprehension categories explaned in the article. It definitely seems that you have an excellent grasp on your own comprehension, from when you were younger to veen now, and having a language arts concentration is very valuable as well for times like these.

Ashleigh Lennemann said...

It is hard to put yourself in a category when it is negative. It is important ot look at the positive things and I am glad that the article gave you some positive. I would agree that as a younger student I was a literalist reader because I did the same thing, I let the author control my thoughts and whatever they said was right. I am glad that you have gotten the opportunity to take classes that professors have gotten you to think outside of the text, unlike the experiences you had in elementary school. I like how you have seen your change and growing as a learner. It is interesting to think about how much we have grown as learners.

Kevin Artman said...

Well it totally agree with your post. As I read the article, I too felt the same way when trying to place myself into a category. I like how you use yourself changing as a reader to support your frustrations with placing yourself in the category. I think we all grow as readers and learners over time, and this could be what makes it so difficult to place ourselves in just a single category

rober626 said...

Hmmmm. I think that I probably fall into each of those categories at different times. Sometimes it's helpful (e.g. like when I read a recipe, I need a literal answer to how long to cook something). I know this article seems negative, but it's difficult to build on strengths without knowing which areas you need to build in. I can also see where you all would get defensive- but remember, we need to train ourselves and our students to be able to critique without seeing it as critical, but rather as an opportunity to learn.

Prince Hamilton said...

I am in a hurry but thanks for your article. Just to let you know I used some points and wish you well.