Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Choral Reading

I thought that planning and performing our own choral reading was the most beneficial activity to get us thinking about the purpose of such activities in the classroom. Teachers use choral reading to develop students’ reading fluency by having them explore and experiment with the arrangement of the text. My group collaborated together to read aloud Chicka Chicka Boom Boom to the rest of the class. We decided to do a cumulative reading, where one student begins reading and after each page, another student joins in. Once everyone is reading, we reversed the process and after each page, one less student would read aloud. We continued this until the last person in the circle was reading – the same student who started reading alone.
During the activity, we were asked to focus on our tempo, rhythm, pitch, and juncture. In terms of the Michigan Grade Level Content Expectations, the activity required us to use enunciation and stress to emphasize key ideas and concepts when presenting. As a group, we decided that we wanted to place a lot of emphasis on “Chicka Chicka Boom Boom”, so we chose one student out of the group to stress this phrase by altering the rhythm. Surrounding this phrase, we also altered the juncture of the reading by making sure there was a longer pause both preceding and following the phrase. Since the book had a lot of rhyming words, it would have been ideal if we were able to coordinate our read at a faster pace, which would have required us to use the GLCEs of pace of speaking to enhance meaning and influence interpretation when presenting. I think if our group would have had a little bit more time to practice, we would have been able to perfect our speed and ability to read in unison. We did not focus a lot on pitch when we were reading aloud.
I thought that there was a lot of support within our group during the activity. As Langer mentions in his article, during recitation, the students look to the teacher for support. For this activity, our group engaged in discussion, not recitation, and we were able to look to each other for support. Since there was not as much guidance from the teacher, we were responsible for working together and encouraging each other to share ideas. As a future teacher, I will have to remember that it is okay to challenge students with open-ended activities that force them to talk things out with each other. The great thing about this activity was since there was not a lot of guidance, every group presented something different. One thing I will remember in the future was that in these kinds of group setting, it is easy for one student to sit back and not participate. It is my role as a teacher to make sure that each group is encourage every member to contribute to discussion. This may be accomplished by assigning one student the faciliator to be responsible to prompting the shyer students to share their ideas.

4 comments:

rober626 said...

YOu raise some excellent points and did a great job of linking to the readings. WIth you guys, you were all pretty well versed in conversational norms. Remember, that with students, it's often difficult for two of them to come to an agreement, let alone a group. YOu will want to do a lot of modeling of disagreements and how to solve them when you first start doing this with kids, and it might be easier to start with pairs of groups of three.

Ashleigh Lennemann said...

I never thought about choral reading in the classroom before and you are right, teachers use it to help students' reading fluency. We did have to depend on each other for ideas because there was either no or little teacher guidance, so it was up to us to come up with the ideas. You are right that it is easy for a student to sit back and let others do all of the work, so it is important that the teacher is making sure that everyone is participating.

Catherine Cook said...

I definitely agree with all the previous comments. Also, I think that assigning roles to groups who are doing choral reading is key. This way, all students are involved. Also, it was nice to see all the different presentations when each group was left to their own interpretations of the assignment.

Kevin Artman said...

I also agree with all of the other previous comments. I like how you mentioned that we were in more of a recitation than a discussion. It is amazing how we were so fixed on getting the group all synced up, that I didn't really think much about this.